Contact Us
HOME INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW STRATEGIC INTERNATIONAL DIVORCE INTERNATIONAL CHILD CUSTODY
International Child Custody
Country-by-Country Information About Child Abduction and Divorce
(Scroll down to find country)
Japanese Family Courts

FAMILY COURTS IN JAPAN


Family courts and their branch offices are established at the same places where district courts and their branch offices are located. In addition, local offices of family courts are located in areas as necessary (77 locations in Japan).


Jurisdiction

The family court, established on January 1, 1949, is a specialized court for family affairs and juvenile delinquency cases. It has, in the first place, jurisdiction over all disputes and conflicts among family members, as well as all related domestic affairs of legal significance.

There exist two ways of solving disputes: by way of determination and by way of conciliation. Such cases as guardianship for adults, granting permission to adopt a minor, and probate are all disposed of by the determination process (shimpan). Such matters as disputes between husband and wife, disputes among relatives (e.g., disputes relating to support and those relating to partition of estate), and divorce cases are all cognizable under the conciliation procedure.

A judicial divorce is distinguished from divorce by mutual agreement. The former may be sought through an action in the district court, but it must commence with conciliation proceedings in the family court. Secondly, the family court has jurisdiction over delinquent juveniles under 20 years of age who have committed a crime or are prone to commit offenses (14-19years old) or who have violated penal provisions or are prone to violate them (under 14 years old). Finally, the family court has jurisdiction over adults indicted for the offenses that are detrimental to the welfare of juveniles.

Cases brought to the family court are handled either by a single judge or a collegiate body of three judges fully utilizing the scientific reports prepared by the family court probation officers as well as the diagnostic results of the medical officers who are experts on psychiatry.

Jurisdiction over Family Affairs Cases

The Family Court has a very broad jurisdiction encompassing all disputes and conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal significance. The Law for Determination of Family Affairs divides these problems into three kinds:

(a) matters which by nature can only be disposed by a court's judgment such as a guardianship for adults, a declaration of disappearance, or a correction of the family registers (These are called Ko-type matters.);

(b) matters which should be disposed in accord with the agreement of the parties such as divorce (These are litigation matters.); and

(c) matters which may be disposed either by agreement of the parties or by a court's decision such as share of expenses arising from marriage or partition of a decedent's estate (These are called Otsu-type matters.)

The law provides that (a) will be governed exclusively by the determination procedure and (b) will follow exclusively the conciliation proceedings while (c) will be governed in the first instance by the conciliation proceedings and, in the event of failure of conciliation, by the determination procedure.

Though a judicial divorce may be sought in Japan by a civil litigation in the District Court, conciliation proceedings must first be commenced in the Family Court. Here an attempt is made through the conciliation proceedings to eliminate difficulties and to reconcile the parties. Since a court's judgment or certification is not required for divorce in Japan (which takes effect by the registration of mutual agreement of the spouses), only disputed divorce cases are brought to the Family Court for conciliation proceedings, where most of the cases are settled. Only when the parties could not reach an agreement and one of the spouses still seeks divorce, a suit will be brought to the District Court.

The new provisional remedy system came into force in the determination procedure in 1981. This is a means whereby the party prevents the adverse party from taking steps which would thwart the enforcement of the final determination during the course of the determination procedure. For instance, in case where a divorced wife applies for a determination of distribution of matrimonial property on divorce and her husband is likely to dispose the property, the Family Court may issue an order of provisional disposition prohibiting him from disposing the property until the final determination.

This new provisional remedy system also enables the party to prevent imminent danger during the determination procedure. For instance, in case where an applicant for a determination of support is too poor to buy the daily necessities, the Family Court may issue an order of provisional disposition forcing the adverse party to pay money temporarily until the final determination. These orders of the Family Court are enforceable.

Although the general procedure (dealt in the District Court) of compulsory execution is available for the enforcement of performance of obligations decided upon or agreed upon in the disposition of family affairs cases, the Family Court has power to take, upon application of a party (obligee), certain measures for ensuring the performance of such obligations. The Family Court will investigate, upon application of the party concerned, to see if an obligation is performed, and if not, admonish and facilitate the other party (obligor) to perform it. In case the obligation is not performed, upon application of a party, the Family Court may issue a performance order if the obligation is concerning property rights. Failure to obey the performance order may result in imposing a non-penal fine against the obligor.

Information and Advising service for domestic affairs at the Family Court is an accompanied service to filing process, rendered by competent members of the personnel in response to the request of the general public.

When any citizen with various family troubles steps in the office of the Family Court, the consultant on duty listens to and helps him/her to find what his/her problems really are. If necessary, as is often the case, the consultant informs him/her of the details of the filing procedure. This service provides an easier access to the proceedings of the Family Courts (and of other social welfare agencies, too), and is very popular as the statistics (389,299 people consulted at the Family Court in 2000.).

Procedures for Family Affairs Cases

(a) Both determination and conciliation proceedings are commenced upon application of the person concerned. The application may be either written or oral. All hearings are not open to the public and informal, which are quite different from litigation in the District Court.

(b) After an application for the determination proceedings is filed, the Judge of Family Affairs adjudicates the case taking into consideration the relevant information obtained through the documents submitted by the party, investigation by the Family Court Probation Officer, hearing before the Judge, etc. This adjudication of the Judge is called "shimpan (determination)", and if the party is not satisfied, he/she may make an appeal within 14 days, and the determination of the Family Court will be reviewed by the High Court. (Types of cases to be reviewed by appeal are provided by law or the Rules of the Supreme Court, so appeal is not always permitted in every case. ) When an appeal is not filed within 14 days or the High Court dismisses the appeal, a determination of the Family Court becomes legally binding. In case a determination becomes legally binding, in accord with the content of the determination, the concerned party may apply for family registration, or get the payment.

(c) Conciliation seeks to settle a family dispute at the Family Court facilitating a reconciliation between the parties. The conciliation proceedings are conducted by a conciliation committee which is normally composed of one Judge of Family Affairs and two Conciliation Commissioners of Family Affairs, one of whom is usually a woman. As mentioned above, the parties are ordinarily summoned to the Family Court for a meeting to hear each party's view, to coordinate requests of concerned parties for agreement.

When parties in the conciliation proceedings reach an agreement approved by the conciliation committee, the agreement is entered in the court's case record and it has the same force as a judgment or an order of determination. Cases most frequently subjected to conciliation are those involving divorce, designation of the parent to exercise parental power, partition of a decedent's estate, compensation on termination of de facto marriage, and support. Applications for divorce are submitted principally by wives, constituting over 70 percent of the total.

After Otsu-type matters mentioned previously, when the parties cannot reach an agreement in conciliation proceedings, the case automatically proceeds to the determination proceedings.

Information on Japanese Family Law:
Spousal violence constitutes a serious violation of human rights, as well as being a crime  continue

The statutory law in Japan contains no provisions  continue

Family courts and their branch offices are established at the same places where district courts and   continue

Some cases in English on Japanese family law  continue

Selected excerpts from Japan's Family Registration Law  continue

This case illustrates a stark illustration of the complete failure of the Japanese legal system to protect children  continue

unofficial translation of Book IV; Relatives  continue

Kyogi Rikon (Consent Divorce)  continue

Has anything changed in the fight against international child abduction?  continue

Japan's private international law  continue

Divorce has constantly been on the mind of Imelda (not her real name), a 36-year-old Filipino woman who married a Japanese man seven years ago.  continue

An American Dad is behind bars and his Japanese ex-wife is a fugitive from justice  continue

In the debate about whether Japan should sign the Hague abduction convention, a serious consequence of Japan's failure to ratify the treaty is being overlooked. Japan's failure to sign the convention is extremely damaging to Japanese nationals living overseas, since  continue

It’s been six years, three weeks and one day since Navy Cmdr. Paul Toland last saw his only child, Erika  continue

We have represented many international clients who  continue

Japan is a haven for international child abduction. Now one child who was abducted to Japan is to be returned to Wisconsin, thanks to our team’s non-stop efforts   continue

On April 14, 2014, the Japanese Law implementing the Hague Abduction Convention  continue

A tentative translation of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Japan concerning Personal Status Litigation has been published by Japan’s Ministry of Justice  continue

This article from ABC News (2008) is based in part on an interview with Jeremy Morley.   continue

Four fathers quietly filed into a theater to watch  continue

After several years of struggling to understand the workings of the Japanese family law system on behalf of Japanese clients or non-Japanese clients with Japanese spouses, I have reluctantly concluded  continue

1996 judgment of the Supreme Court of Japan  continue

The Supreme Court of New Jersey has upheld a decision allowing a Japanese mother to relocate with her six-year old child   continue

In Japan since 2003 there have been two ways to calculate child support. The first way  continue

Japanese law enforcement and social service agencies unfortunately seem unable to enforce custody and support orders   continue

Under the Japanese Civil Code, either the husband or wife must change their family name to be married legally. Usually it is the wife who does so.  continue

Additional Articles
<