|
Judicial Prevention of International Child Abduction
Risk Factors for Parental Child Abduction
International Child Visitation
|
|
CONNECTICUT LAW TRIBUNE, AUGUST
2007
OVERSEAS ABDUCTIONS
A GROWING CONCERN
Custody battles include disputes over foreign
travel
By JEREMY D. MORLEY
H ow
can one parent stop the other parent from taking a child to visit a
dangerous country? It’s a question of increasing concern in many
custody matters.
The following
tips have been developed as a result of handling these issues on a
regular basis in collaboration with local family lawyers across the
country.
Collect hard evidence of the dangers that the
proposed visitation presents.
Any parent who
opposes overseas visitation, especially to a parent’s country of
origin or current domicile, has a heavy burden of proof.
Do not underestimate what you need to do to prove
your case. You must go to court with very strong evidence already
lined up. You have to be fully prepared to show that there is a very
real risk— not simply a suspicion or a fear—that your child will not
be returned.
Collect evidence to show the court that there is a
real likelihood that the other parent will not return the child.
So-called “red flags” include the other parent having: previously
abducted or threatened to abduct the child; citizenship in the
othercountry and strong emotional or cultural ties to it; no strong
ties to the child’s home state; and a history of instability.
Demonstrate respect for the rights of the other
parent.
While the
language of state laws varies—some referring only to the best
interests of the child with others including a presumption of joint
parenting — American courts invariably encourage and impose shared
parenting in one form or another. A parent who inappropriately
hinders or obstructs the other parent’s involvement in the child’s
life will not be viewed favorably.
Do not rely on a country’s poor reputation for
corruption or danger.
Do not take it
for granted that a court will know that a particular country has an
ineffective legal system or that the country is a dangerous place
for Westerners. You must present evidence to the court—whether
through witnesses or through documents—that will allow the court to
make a reasoned conclusion based on real and convincing evidence
that the requested visitation should be denied.
Be calm, not hysterical.
You may be
panic-stricken at the thought of your precious one being taken to
another country, but you should not come across as over-the-top. You
should be prepared to explain calmly to the court the reasons for
your grave concern.
Do not take comfort in the mere fact that the child
is being taken to a country that is a party to the Hague Convention .
The Convention is a strong international treaty, but countries vary
dramatically in their enforcement of it. Countries such as the UK,
Australia and New Zealand typically return children promptly and
efficiently, but some act much more slowly (Germany and France, for
example) and others act at a glacial pace or not at all (e.g.,
Mexico, Colombia and Austria).
Do not leave it to the last minute to seek legal
protection.
While the courts can usually make emergency orders, it is far better
to prepare and submit a case well in advance of the scheduled
departure date. In addition, a judge will be less likely to prevent
a trip overseas that has been scheduled for a long time.
■ |